Labanauskas, L (2021). ‘Policijos pareigūnų(ių) ir prokurorų(ių) apklausos ataskaita’ [Report of the survey among police officers and prosecutors]. Vilnius: žurnalistu etikos inspektoriaus tarnyba
Country
Lithuania
Title
Labanauskas, L (2021). ‘Policijos pareigūnų(ių) ir prokurorų(ių) apklausos ataskaita’ [Report of the survey among police officers and prosecutors]. Vilnius: žurnalistu etikos inspektoriaus tarnyba
View full Research
Year
2021
Type of publication
Survey - quantitative research
Geographical coverage
National
Area/location of interest
Not applicable - national level
Type of Institution
National human rights body
Institution
The survey was carried in the framework of the project ‘#NoPlace4Hate: Improving Institutional Response to Hate Speech in Lithuania’ (#NoPlace 4Hate: tobulinant institucijų atsaką į neapykantos kalbos reiškinį Lietuvoje) which was implemented in
Main Thematic Focus
Hate crime Hate speech
Target Population
Ethnic minorities Religious minorities lgbtiq Muslims
Key findings
16.2 % of the research participants indicated that the most vulnerable to hate crime in Lithuania group – Muslims. The hate crimes against people with disabilities, Jews and people who have visible racial or background sights were recognized the best by police officers and prosecutors. The study points out that the research participants are better acquainted how to recognize hate speech and hate crime in comparison with general society, however at the same time 9.6 % of research participants "agree" or "absolutely agree" that negative comments online about some societal groups do not harm anyone.
Methodology (Qualitative/Quantitative and exact type used, questionnaires etc)
Quantitative (online survey among prosecutors and police officers)
Sample details and representativeness
An online survey among 88 prosecutors and 474 police officers was carried on 12-25 March 2021. The survey investigated the challenges encountered by police officers and prosecutors in addressing hate crime.
DISCLAIMERThe information presented here is collected under contract by the FRA's research network FRANET. The information and views contained do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA.